Napoleon Bonaparte: Good Or Bad Essay

nap Bonaparte was non a devtaboo trainer and although he did befriend France he was too bloodthirsty and arrogant to be considered a good ruler. He did gain much land and wealth for France however in that location was too much bloodshed involved. He said that he did not care how much blood was spil direct as long as he got his way and won he was fine with death. This shows that he has no forethought for the people of France and would throw away their lives so that he could come out victorious. One cannot be considered a great leader unless he is a leader of the people and although the country may be wealthy that doesnt necessarily mean that the French people are happy.In concomitant Napoleon was also very arrogant, a trait that eventually led to his downfall. His invasion of Russia was a mixture of his arrogance and greed that eventually lead to the death of almost all of his troops and his downfall. That downfall caused the deaths of hundreds of thousands of men in the army a nd also burned Russia to the ground and brought France plummeting downward. Altogether although Napoleon gave France wealth he would not be considered a great due to the do of bloodshed under his reign.